Developing a Study — Part 3 — Observation

Posted on: July 11, 2010 in The Hub Feature

“You must teach what is in accord with sound doc­trine” (Titus 2:1)

We’re tak­ing a look at how to develop a study for your GROWTH Group, based around the acronym SOAR.

Today, we’re look­ing at the first part of this — O for Observation.

OBSERVATION
Once the cor­rect mean­ing and use of the text is determ­ined, you can work within that frame­work to ascer­tain the cent­ral truth of the scrip­ture. In many instances there will also be sup­port­ing truths in the pas­sage which apply to other rel­ev­ant areas. As one who has in mind the ori­ginal Teach­ing Goal, your efforts will be dir­ec­ted at fi nding what the pas­sage might mean to your group today.

You may have selec­ted this pas­sage because it will poten­tially cor­rect mis­con­cep­tions held by some mem­bers, or may chal­lenge sin­ful or neg­lect­ful prac­tices. As such you may have to take pains to present the truths within in such a way as to offer truth and life, rather than merely offer­ing a pub­lic rebuke which can fail to take hold due to offence. Remem­ber, “we must put the hay where the horses can eat it”. Even though most of us require cor­rec­tion from time to time, a teacher’s skill often fi nds ways to have the per­son feel like they dis­covered the error (and the path out of it) themselves.

Often the best way to foster the group’s abil­ity to observe the cent­ral and sup­port­ing truths of the text is to prac­tice the art of ask­ing the right ques­tions. Whilst a good prac­tice is to only ask ques­tions to which you already know the answer, at times we need to ask lead­ing ques­tions that encour­age discovery.

For example, the leader might say “This pas­sage seems quite dir­ect, why do you think a writer who so obvi­ously wants the best for the recip­i­ents be so strong on this issue?”. Note a few things about that question:

  • It is an open ques­tion. Avoid ask­ing ques­tions that can be ignored or given a yes/no answer.
  • It requires them to enter the situ­ation and determ­ine what is hap­pen­ing. This keeps the dis­cus­sion within the scope of the ori­ginal meaning.
  • It is non-accusatory. The ques­tion incites empathy more that defens­ive­ness, and also presents the author as the one doing the cor­rect­ing, rather than the group leader.
  • It infers a pos­it­ive, life-giving motive. The ques­tion assumes that the author, and there­fore prob­ably God, is offer­ing an embra­cing and pos­it­ive option of a bet­ter way.
  • Use ques­tions to your advant­age. Often people learn most effect­ively when they feel they have dis­covered the answers them­selves. Use ques­tions through­out the study to sum­mar­ise dis­cus­sion, ascer­tain the mean­ing of texts, dis­cover diverse applic­a­tions and foster inter-active learning.


    Writ­ten by Pat Hegarty, from STEP 4 — Passing It On.
    STEP 4 Resources — ©2009 Ken­more Baptist Church. For more inform­a­tion on STEP 4, and the Path­ways Spir­itual Devel­op­ment pro­gram, visit us here

    Leave a Reply